Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16623
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKevric, Jasmina-
dc.contributor.authorPapa, Nathan-
dc.contributor.authorToshniwal, Sumeet-
dc.contributor.authorPerera, Marlon-
dc.date2017-03-02-
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-24T00:49:12Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-24T00:49:12Z-
dc.date.issued2018-04-
dc.identifier.citationANZ Journal of Surgery 2018; 88(4): E298-E302en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16623-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Groin hernia repairs (GHRs) are among the commonest general surgical procedures in the Western population. The introduction of minimally invasive surgery has prompted the development of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal and trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs. We aimed to determine the hernia treatment trends in Australia over the last 15 years. METHODS: Using Medicare Benefit Schedule data, we categorized the number of laparoscopic and open hernia repairs between 2000 and 2015 in Australia. Population data were collected from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Hernia repair rates were standardized by age, gender and location. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 324 618 GHRs were performed on adult patients in Australia, 43% by a laparoscopic method. While there was a slight yearly increase in overall total GHRs performed, laparoscopic surgeries increased by 3.1 per 100 000 population every year (95% CI: 2.9-3.3) while open surgeries declined yearly by 2.6 per 100 000 population (95% CI: 2.4-2.8). From the available data, there appears to be a crossover point in 2011/2012 where the laparoscopic hernia repair became more frequent. Considerable state and gender-based trends exist. CONCLUSIONS: The use of laparoscopic GHRs has increased considerably over the last 15 years. Despite the increased use, significant state-based and gender discrepancies were observed. Our data offer insight to the public sector and the respective healthcare-related expenditures pertaining to laparoscopic hernia repair.en_US
dc.subjectAustralian trend hernia repairen_US
dc.subjectInguinal herniaen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopic hernia repairen_US
dc.titleFifteen-year groin hernia trends in Australia: the era of minimally invasive surgeonsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleANZ Journal of Surgeryen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCancer Epidemiology Centre, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28251750en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ans.13899en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3188-1803en_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2
checked on Feb 5, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.