Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework to investigate why patients were or were not assessed for rehabilitation after stroke
Austin Authors: Lynch, Elizabeth A;Luker, Julie A;Cadilhac, Dominique A;Fryer, Caroline E;Hillier, Susan L
Affiliation: Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Brain Recovery Stroke and Ageing Research Centre, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 15-Jul-2016 2016-07-15
Publication information: Clinical Rehabilitation 2017; 31(7): 966-977
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To explore the factors perceived to affect rehabilitation assessment and referral practices for patients with stroke. DESIGN: Qualitative study using data from focus groups analysed thematically and then mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework. SETTING: Eight acute stroke units in two states of Australia. SUBJECTS: Health professionals working in acute stroke units. INTERVENTIONS: Health professionals at all sites had participated in interventions to improve rehabilitation assessment and referral practices, which included provision of copies of an evidence-based decision-making rehabilitation Assessment Tool and pathway. RESULTS: Eight focus groups were conducted (32 total participants). Reported rehabilitation assessment and referral practices varied markedly between units. Continence and mood were not routinely assessed (4 units), and people with stroke symptoms were not consistently referred to rehabilitation (4 units). Key factors influencing practice were identified and included whether health professionals perceived that use of the Assessment Tool would improve rehabilitation assessment practices (theoretical domain 'social and professional role'); beliefs about outcomes from changing practice such as increased equity for patients or conversely that changing rehabilitation referral patterns would not affect access to rehabilitation ('belief about consequences'); the influence of the unit's relationships with other groups including rehabilitation teams ('social influences' domain) and understanding within the acute stroke unit team of the purpose of changing assessment practices ('knowledge' domain). CONCLUSION: This study has identified that health professionals' perceived roles, beliefs about consequences from changing practice and relationships with rehabilitation service providers were perceived to influence rehabilitation assessment and referral practices on Australian acute stroke units.
DOI: 10.1177/0269215516658938
ORCID: 0000-0001-8162-682X
Journal: Clinical Rehabilitation
PubMed URL:
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Stroke
Theoretical domains framework
Acute Stroke unit
assessment for rehabilitation
Qualitative study
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

checked on Jan 27, 2023

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.