Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: The intolerance of regulatory sequence to genetic variation predicts gene dosage sensitivity
Austin Authors: Petrovski, S;Gussow, AB;Wang, Q;Halvorsen, M;Han, Y;Weir, WH;Allen, AS;Goldstein, DB
Affiliation: Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Austin Health and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Institute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
Center for Human Genome Variation, Duke University, School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
Issue Date: 30-Sep-2015
Publication information: PLoS Genetics 2015; 11(9): e1005492
Abstract: Noncoding sequence contains pathogenic mutations. Yet, compared with mutations in protein-coding sequence, pathogenic regulatory mutations are notoriously difficult to recognize. Most fundamentally, we are not yet adept at recognizing the sequence stretches in the human genome that are most important in regulating the expression of genes. For this reason, it is difficult to apply to the regulatory regions the same kinds of analytical paradigms that are being successfully applied to identify mutations among protein-coding regions that influence risk. To determine whether dosage sensitive genes have distinct patterns among their noncoding sequence, we present two primary approaches that focus solely on a gene's proximal noncoding regulatory sequence. The first approach is a regulatory sequence analogue of the recently introduced residual variation intolerance score (RVIS), termed noncoding RVIS, or ncRVIS. The ncRVIS compares observed and predicted levels of standing variation in the regulatory sequence of human genes. The second approach, termed ncGERP, reflects the phylogenetic conservation of a gene's regulatory sequence using GERP++. We assess how well these two approaches correlate with four gene lists that use different ways to identify genes known or likely to cause disease through changes in expression: 1) genes that are known to cause disease through haploinsufficiency, 2) genes curated as dosage sensitive in ClinGen's Genome Dosage Map, 3) genes judged likely to be under purifying selection for mutations that change expression levels because they are statistically depleted of loss-of-function variants in the general population, and 4) genes judged unlikely to cause disease based on the presence of copy number variants in the general population. We find that both noncoding scores are highly predictive of dosage sensitivity using any of these criteria. In a similar way to ncGERP, we assess two ensemble-based predictors of regional noncoding importance, ncCADD and ncGWAVA, and find both scores are significantly predictive of human dosage sensitive genes and appear to carry information beyond conservation, as assessed by ncGERP. These results highlight that the intolerance of noncoding sequence stretches in the human genome can provide a critical complementary tool to other genome annotation approaches to help identify the parts of the human genome increasingly likely to harbor mutations that influence risk of disease.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005492
Journal: PLoS Genetics
PubMed URL:
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Gene dosage
Genetic variation
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.