Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11752
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSilvester, Williamen
dc.contributor.authorParslow, Ruth Aen
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Virginia Jen
dc.contributor.authorFullam, Rachael Sen
dc.contributor.authorSjanta, Rebekahen
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Lynneen
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Vanessaen
dc.contributor.authorHudson, Rosalieen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:22:45Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:22:45Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-15en
dc.identifier.citationBmj Supportive & Palliative Care 2013; 3(2): 188-95en
dc.identifier.govdoc23626906en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11752en
dc.description.abstractTo report on the quality of advance care planning (ACP) documents in use in residential aged care facilities (RACF) in areas of Victoria Australia prior to a systematic intervention; to report on the development and performance of an aged care specific Advance Care Plan template used during the intervention.An audit of the quality of pre-existing documentation used to record resident treatment preferences and end-of-life wishes at participating RACFs; development and pilot of an aged care specific Advance Care Plan template; an audit of the completeness and quality of Advance Care Plans completed on the new template during a systematic ACP intervention.19 selected RACFs (managed by 12 aged care organisations) in metropolitan and regional areas of Victoria.Documentation in use at facilities prior to the ACP intervention most commonly recorded preferences regarding hospital transfer, life prolonging treatment and personal/cultural/religious wishes. However, 7 of 12 document sets failed to adequately and clearly specify the resident's preferences as regards life prolonging medical treatment. The newly developed aged care specific Advance Care Plan template was met with approval by participating RACFs. Of 203 Advance Care Plans completed on the template throughout the project period, 49% included the appointment of a Medical Enduring Power of Attorney. Requests concerning medical treatment were specified in almost all completed documents (97%), with 73% nominating the option of refusal of life-prolonging treatment. Over 90% of plans included information concerning residents' values and beliefs, and future health situations that the resident would find to be unacceptable were specified in 78% of completed plans.Standardised procedures and documentation are needed to improve the quality of processes, documents and outcomes of ACP in the residential aged care sector.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAdvance Care Planningen
dc.subject.otherAdvance Directivesen
dc.subject.otherAged Careen
dc.subject.otherEnd-of-lifeen
dc.subject.otherNursing Homesen
dc.subject.otherTerminal Careen
dc.titleDevelopment and evaluation of an aged care specific Advance Care Plan.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMJ supportive & palliative careen
dc.identifier.affiliationRespecting Patient Choices, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000392en
dc.description.pages188-95en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23626906en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2
checked on Jan 27, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.