Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11584
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHayward, Philip A R-
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Ying Yan-
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Trong T-
dc.contributor.authorHare, David L-
dc.contributor.authorBuxton, Brian F-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:11:58Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:11:58Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-16en
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2012; 145(1): 140-8; discussion 148-9en
dc.identifier.govdoc23084100en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11584en
dc.description.abstractWhether to graft a moderately stenosed coronary vessel remains debatable. We investigated whether grafting such vessels is warranted based on angiographic evidence of disease progression.Of 619 patients who underwent on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in an ongoing, randomized radial artery trial, 405 have at least 1 follow-up angiogram at a mean of 6.2 ± 3.1 years (range, 0-14 years) after surgery. Percent diameter stenosis in each major native vessel was reported by 3 cardiac specialists and classified as either moderate (40%-69%) or severe (≥70%) stenosis. Progression of native vessel disease and graft patency were determined by comparison of pre- and postoperative angiography.A total of 3816 native vessels and 1242 bypass grafts were analyzed, of which 386 moderate preoperative lesions were identified, 323 of which were grafted. In all territories, grafted vessels had greater risk of disease progression than ungrafted equivalents (43.4% vs 10.5%, P < .001). Moderate lesions were more likely than severe lesions to remain unchanged on follow-up angiography (52.6% vs 31.1%, P < .001). Only 1 in 7 moderate lesions in the right coronary artery exhibited significant progression during follow-up if left ungrafted, whereas the likelihood of progression in left-sided counterparts approached 50%. Arterial and vein grafts to left-sided moderately stenosed vessels had excellent patency (83% and 77% at 8 years, respectively), which was not matched by right-sided grafts (P = .051). Placement of a graft for a moderate lesion was associated with significantly greater incidence of disease progression, most marked in the right coronary territory.The greater risk of progression of left-sided moderate lesions, and high graft patency rates when bypassed, suggests that the balance of clinical judgment lies in favor of grafting moderate left-sided lesions. In the right coronary system, however, a lesion is likely to remain moderate if left ungrafted and, with a low risk of progression, it may be reasonable to leave these vessels undisturbed.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherCardiopulmonary Bypassen
dc.subject.otherChi-Square Distributionen
dc.subject.otherCoronary Angiographyen
dc.subject.otherCoronary Artery Bypass.adverse effects.methodsen
dc.subject.otherCoronary Stenosis.physiopathology.radiography.surgeryen
dc.subject.otherDisease Progressionen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherGraft Occlusion, Vascular.etiology.physiopathology.radiographyen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherInternal Mammary-Coronary Artery Anastomosis.adverse effectsen
dc.subject.otherKaplan-Meier Estimateen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherPredictive Value of Testsen
dc.subject.otherProportional Hazards Modelsen
dc.subject.otherRadial Artery.physiopathology.radiography.transplantationen
dc.subject.otherRisk Assessmenten
dc.subject.otherRisk Factorsen
dc.subject.otherSaphenous Vein.physiopathology.radiography.transplantationen
dc.subject.otherSeverity of Illness Indexen
dc.subject.otherTime Factorsen
dc.subject.otherTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subject.otherVascular Patencyen
dc.subject.otherVictoriaen
dc.titleShould all moderate coronary lesions be grafted during primary coronary bypass surgery? An analysis of progression of native vessel disease during a randomized trial of conduits.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleThe Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.050en
dc.description.pages140-8; discussion 148-9en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9554-6556-
dc.identifier.pubmedid23084100-
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherBuxton, Brian F
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
crisitem.author.deptCardiac Surgery-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on Jun 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.