Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11033
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Janice Nen
dc.contributor.authorLawrentschuk, Nathanen
dc.contributor.authorGyomber, Dennisen
dc.contributor.authorRogerson, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorBolton, Damien Men
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T00:36:43Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T00:36:43Z
dc.date.issued2010-05-15en
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Urology 2010; 184(1): 92-8en
dc.identifier.govdoc20478600en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11033en
dc.description.abstractWe evaluated indications and outcomes of cystectomy in patients with spinal cord injury in a urology unit attached to a statewide spinal cord injury service.We performed a review of all patients with spinal cord injury in our database who underwent cystectomy between 1997 and 2008. Demographic, pathological and perioperative data were collected. Oncological outcomes were documented for those with malignant indications while patient satisfaction was recorded using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale for all patients.Of 2,569 acute spinal cord injury presentations there were 14 patients who underwent cystectomy. Mean patient age was 53 years (range 39 to 72). Of the 14 patients 9 had malignant disease and 5 had benign indications for cystectomy. Overall mean followup was 48 months (median 30.8). Cumulative survival in the malignant cohort was 66.7% with a 33.3% recurrence rate resulting in death. All survivors remained disease-free at a mean of 49 months (median 31). Mean Patient Global Impression of Improvement score was 3 (range 1-very much better to 7-very much worse). In the nonmalignant cohort mean followup was 75 months (median 77). The overall Patient Global Impression of Improvement score in this group was 2.4, suggesting overall positive patient satisfaction.In patients with spinal cord injury cystectomy is performed almost as often for nonmalignant as for malignant indications. Our data support a more aggressive presentation of cancer with a different pathological profile but not survival compared to normal populations. Centers treating patients with spinal cord injury should consider a lower threshold for the surgical management of bladder cancer where appropriate, especially considering that morbidity, satisfaction and outcome do not appear to be compromised in patients with spinal cord injury.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherBCG Vaccine.administration & dosageen
dc.subject.otherCystectomy.methodsen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherLength of Stay.statistics & numerical dataen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherNeoplasm Recurrence, Localen
dc.subject.otherPatient Satisfactionen
dc.subject.otherPostoperative Complications.epidemiologyen
dc.subject.otherQuality of Lifeen
dc.subject.otherSmoking.epidemiologyen
dc.subject.otherSpinal Cord Injuries.complicationsen
dc.subject.otherSurvival Rateen
dc.subject.otherTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subject.otherUrinary Bladder Neoplasms.complications.surgeryen
dc.titleCystectomy in patients with spinal cord injury: indications and long-term outcomes.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleThe Journal of urologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Department of Surgery, Urology Unit, Austin Hospital, Victoria, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.014en
dc.description.pages92-8en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20478600en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2
checked on Feb 3, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.