Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10729
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOwen, Andrew Ren
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Iain Ren
dc.contributor.authorAnnamalai, Ganesanen
dc.contributor.authorRoditi, Giles Hen
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Richard Den
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Lilian Sen
dc.contributor.authorMoss, Jon Gen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T00:16:21Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T00:16:21Z
dc.date.issued2008-12-10en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology : Jvir 2008; 20(2): 165-72en
dc.identifier.govdoc19081736en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10729en
dc.description.abstractTo prospectively compare contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography against digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in patients with critical lower-limb ischemia.Thirty patients with critical lower limb ischemia underwent both CE MR angiography and DSA. CE MR angiography commenced with a dedicated high-resolution study of the below-knee arteries followed by a three-station bolus-chase examination. Two blinded observers recorded the severity of the most significant stenosis within each arterial segment. Interobserver agreement was calculated and, with DSA as the reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity of CE MR angiography for the detection of significant stenosis (>or=50% luminal narrowing) or occlusion was calculated.All 390 arterial segments were scored by both observers. Sensitivity was higher in the distal segments (92%-96%) compared with the proximal segments (69%-79%). Specificity was similar in distal (90%-91%) and more proximal segments (86%-96%). Overall, interobserver agreement was excellent (kappa = 0.95 for CE MR angiography and DSA) and was superior within the distal segments. Twenty-eight segments that were considered occluded on DSA were shown to be patent on CE MR angiography and 16 segments that were considered occluded on CE MR angiography were shown to be patent on DSA.In patients with critical lower-limb ischemia, CE MR angiography with high-resolution distal imaging is highly accurate for assessment of the below-knee arteries. Both DSA and CE MR angiography may identify patent vessels that are considered occluded based on the other modality.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAdulten
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherAged, 80 and overen
dc.subject.otherAngiography, Digital Subtraction.methodsen
dc.subject.otherContrast Mediaen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherGadolinium DTPA.diagnostic useen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherIschemia.diagnosisen
dc.subject.otherLeg.blood supply.pathology.radiographyen
dc.subject.otherMagnetic Resonance Angiography.methodsen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherObserver Variationen
dc.subject.otherReproducibility of Resultsen
dc.subject.otherSensitivity and Specificityen
dc.titleCritical lower-limb ischemia: the diagnostic performance of dual-phase injection MR angiography (including high-resolution distal imaging) compared with digital subtraction angiography.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIRen
dc.identifier.affiliationandrewowen@doctors.org.uken
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jvir.2008.10.014en
dc.description.pages165-72en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19081736en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

8
checked on Feb 1, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.