Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/22681
Title: Assessment of agreement and interchangeability between the TEG5000 and TEG6S thromboelastography haemostasis analysers: a prospective validation study.
Authors: Lloyd-Donald, Patryck;Churilov, Leonid;Zia, Faizan;Bellomo, Rinaldo;Hart, Graeme K;McCall, Peter R;Mårtensson, Johan;Glassford, Neil J;Weinberg, Laurence
Affiliation: Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Melbourne Brain Centre, 245 Burgundy St, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden
Department of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 30-Mar-2019
EDate: 2019-03-30
Citation: BMC anesthesiology 2019; 19(1): 45
Abstract: TEG6S® and TEG5000® (Haemonetics Corp, USA) are haemostasis analysers that measure viscoelasticity properties of whole blood. Both use different mechanisms to assess similar components of the coagulation process. The aim of this study was to assess agreement and interchangeability between the TEG6S and TEG5000 analysers. 3.5 mL whole blood was collected from 25 adult patients in a tertiary intensive care unit (ICU). Analysis was performed using TEG6S and TEG5000 haemostatic platforms. Agreement between platforms was measured using Lin's concordance coefficient (Lin's CC), further validated using intraclass correlation coefficients and reduced major axis regression (RMAR). Sixteen (64%) patients were male; mean (range) age: 59yo (23-86). TEG6S and TEG5000 systems were broadly interchangeable. The majority of TEG variables demonstrated almost perfect or substantial agreement and minimal proportional bias (maximum amplitude demonstrated a fixed bias). LY30%, however, demonstrated poor agreement and a proportional bias. Lin's CC coefficients (95% CI, RMAR slope, intercept) between TEG6S and TEG5000 variables were: R time: 0.78 (0.64-0.92, 0.76, 0.92); K time: 0.82 (0.69-0.94, 1.30, - 0.93); alpha angle: 0.79 (0.64-0.95, 1.04, - 1.43); maximum amplitude (MA): 0.90 (0.83-0.96, 0.99, - 5.0); LY30%: 0.34 (0.1-0.58, 0.43, 0.04). Adult patients with critical illness demonstrate almost perfect agreement in the R time and MA, substantial agreement in K time and alpha angle, but poor agreement in LY30%, as measured by the TEG6S and TEG5000 analysers. With the exception of LY30%, the TEG6S and TEG5000 platforms appear interchangeable. This has important implications for use in clinical practice and multi-site research programs. ANZCRT number: 12617000062325 , registered 12/Jan17. Retrospectively registered.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/22681
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0717-7
ORCID: 0000-0001-7403-7680
0000-0002-9807-6606
0000-0002-1650-8939
0000-0001-8739-7896
PubMed URL: 30927909
Type: Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Subjects: Coagulation
Device
Haemostasis
Monitoring
Thromboelastography
Viscoelastic
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.