Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/21783
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGaudino, Mario-
dc.contributor.authorBenedetto, Umberto-
dc.contributor.authorFremes, Stephen-
dc.contributor.authorBallman, Karla-
dc.contributor.authorBiondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe-
dc.contributor.authorSedrakyan, Art-
dc.contributor.authorNasso, Giuseppe-
dc.contributor.authorRaman, Jai S-
dc.contributor.authorBuxton, Brian-
dc.contributor.authorHayward, Philip A-
dc.contributor.authorMoat, Neil-
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorWebb, Carolyn-
dc.contributor.authorPeric, Miodrag-
dc.contributor.authorPetrovic, Ivana-
dc.contributor.authorYoo, Kyung J-
dc.contributor.authorHameed, Irbaz-
dc.contributor.authorDi Franco, Antonino-
dc.contributor.authorMoscarelli, Marco-
dc.contributor.authorSpeziale, Giuseppe-
dc.contributor.authorGirardi, Leonard N-
dc.contributor.authorHare, David L-
dc.contributor.authorTaggart, David P-
dc.date2019-09-18-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-23T04:43:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-23T04:43:00Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-18-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery 2019; 56(6): 1025-1030en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/21783-
dc.description.abstractIt is generally accepted that radial artery (RA) grafts have better mid-term patency rate compared to saphenous vein grafts. However, the clinical correlates of the improved patency rate are still debated. Observational studies have suggested increased survival and event-free survival for patients who receive an RA rather than a saphenous vein, but they are open to bias and confounders. The only evidence based on randomized data is a pooled meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trial comparing the RA and the saphenous vein published by the RADial artery International Alliance (RADIAL). In the RADIAL database, improved freedom from follow-up cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization) was found at 5-year follow-up in the RA arm. The most important limitation of the RADIAL analysis is that most of the included trials had an angiographic follow-up in the first 5 years and it is unclear whether the rate of repeat revascularization (the main driver of the composite outcome) was clinically indicated due to per-protocol angiographies. Here, we present the protocol for the long-term analysis of the RADIAL database. By extending the follow-up beyond the 5th postoperative year (all trials except 1 did not have angiographic follow-up beyond 5 years), we aim to provide data on the role of RA in coronary artery bypass surgery with respect to long-term outcomes.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectArteriesen_US
dc.subjectCoronary artery bypassen_US
dc.subjectMyocardial revascularizationen_US
dc.subjectRadial Artery Patency Studyen_US
dc.subjectRadial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency trialen_US
dc.titleThe RADial artery International ALliance (RADIAL) extended follow-up study: rationale and study protocol.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgeryen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USAen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol, UKen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canadaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USAen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAnthea Hospital, Bari, Italyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNHLI, Imperial College London, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDedinje Cardiovascular Institute and Belgrade University School of Medicine, Belgrade, Serbiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationYonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Koreaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USAen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAnthea Hospital, Bari, Italyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USAen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationMediterranea Cardiocentro, Naples, Italyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Healthen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University, Rome, Italyen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejcts/ezz247en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid31535147-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherHare, David L
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptCardiac Surgery-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.