Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Accuracy of blinded clinician interpretation of single-lead smartphone electrocardiograms and a proposed clinical workflow.|
|Authors:||Koshy, Anoop N;Sajeev, Jithin K;Negishi, Kazuaki;Wong, Michael C;Pham, Christopher B;Cooray, Sumudu P;Khavar, Yeganeh;Roberts, Louise;Cooke, Jennifer C;Teh, Andrew W|
|Affiliation:||Austin Health Clinical School, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia|
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Department of Cardiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Australia
Monash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Department of Cardiology, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|Citation:||American heart journal 2018; online first: 23 August|
|Abstract:||Despite the appeal of smartphone-based electrocardiograms (ECGs) for arrhythmia screening, a paucity of data exists on the accuracy of primary care physicians' and cardiologists' interpretation of tracings compared with the device's automated diagnosis. Using 408 ECGs in 51 patients, we demonstrate a variable accuracy in clinician interpretation of smartphone-based ECGs, with only cardiologists demonstrating satisfactory agreement when referenced against a 12-lead ECG. Combining the device automated diagnostic algorithm with cardiologist interpretation of only uninterpretable traces yielded excellent results and provides an efficient, cost-effective workflow for the utilization of a smartphone-based ECG in clinical practice.|
|Appears in Collections:||Journal articles|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.