Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19568
Title: Advances and Unmet Needs in the Therapeutics of Bone Fragility.
Authors: Ramchand, Sabashini K;Seeman, Ego
Affiliation: Mary Mackillop Institute of Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Department of Endocrinology, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Issue Date: 6-Sep-2018
EDate: 2018-09-06
Citation: Frontiers in endocrinology 2018; 9: 505
Abstract: The prevalence of fragility fractures increases as longevity increases the proportion of the elderly in the community. Until recently, the majority of studies have targeted women with osteoporosis defined as a bone mineral density (BMD) T score of < -2.5 SD, despite evidence that the population burden of fractures arises from women with osteopenia. Antiresorptive agents reduce vertebral and hip fracture risk by ~50 percent during 3 years but efficacy against non-vertebral fractures, 80% of all fractures in the community, is reported in few studies, and of those, the risk reduction is only 20-30%. Recent advances in the use of antiresorptives and anabolic agents has addressed some of these unmet needs. Zoledronic acid is now reported to reduce vertebral and non-vertebral fractures rates in women with osteopenia. Studies using teriparatide demonstrate better vertebral and clinical (symptomatic vertebral and non-vertebral) antifracture efficacy than risedronate. Abaloparatide, a peptide sharing amino acid sequences with teriparatide, reduces vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody suppressing sclerostin, reduces vertebral and non-vertebral fractures within a year of starting treatment, and does so more greatly than alendronate. Some recent studies signal undesirable effects of therapy but provide essential cautionary insights into long term management. Cessation of denosumab is associated with a rapid increase in bone remodeling and the uncommon but clinically important observation of increased multiple vertebral fractures suggesting the need to start alternative anti-resorptive therapy around the time of stopping denosumab. Antiresorptives like bisphosphonates and denosumab suppress remodeling but not completely. Antifracture efficacy may be limited, in part, as a consequence of continued unsuppressed remodeling, particularly in cortical bone. Bisphosphonates may not distribute in deeper cortical bone, so unbalanced intracortical remodeling continues to cause microstructural deterioration. In addition, suppressed remodeling may compromise the material composition by increasing matrix mineral density and glycosylation of collagen. As antiresorptive agents do not restore microstructural deterioration existing at the time of starting treatment, under some circumstances, anabolic therapy may be more appropriate first line treatment. Combining antiresorptive and anabolic therapy is an alternative but whether anti-fracture efficacy is greater than that achieved by either treatment alone is not known.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19568
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00505
PubMed URL: 30237785
ISSN: 1664-2392
Type: Journal Article
Review
Subjects: anabolic agents
antiresorptive agents
bone fragility
fractures
microstructure
osteopenia
osteoporosis
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.