Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19354
Title: Overcoming challenges in implementing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: lessons learnt from using a checklist training course to facilitate rapid scale up in Madagascar.
Authors: Close, Kristin L;Baxter, Linden S;Ravelojaona, Vaonandianina A;Rakotoarison, Hasiniaina N;Bruno, Emily;Herbert, Alison;Andean, Vanessa;Callahan, James;Andriamanjato, Hery H;White, Michelle C
Affiliation: Department of Medical Capacity Building, Mercy Ships, Cotonou, Benin
Department of Medical Capacity Building, Mercy Ships, Toamasina, Madagascar
Nuffield Department of Anesthesia, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
Program in Global Surgery and Social Change, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Department of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Ministère de la Santé Publique, Antananarivo, Madagascar
Department of Anaesthesia, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
Issue Date: 29-Sep-2017
EDate: 2017
Citation: BMJ global health 2017; 2(Suppl 4): e000430
Abstract: The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist was launched in 2009, and appropriate use reduces mortality, surgical site infections and complications after surgery by up to 50%. Implementation across low-income and middle-income countries has been slow; published evidence is restricted to reports from a few single institutions, and significant challenges to successful implementation have been identified and presented. The Mercy Ships Medical Capacity Building team developed a multidisciplinary 3-day Surgical Safety Checklist training programme designed for rapid wide-scale implementation in all regional referral hospitals in Madagascar. Particular attention was given to addressing previously reported challenges to implementation. We taught 427 participants in 21 hospitals; at 3-4 months postcourse, we collected surveys from 183 participants in 20 hospitals and conducted one focus group per hospital. We used a concurrent embedded approach in this mixed-methods design to evaluate participants' experiences and behavioural change as a result of the training programme. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and inductive thematic analysis, respectively. This analysis paper describes our field experiences and aims to report participants' responses to the training course, identify further challenges to implementation and describe the lessons learnt. Recommendations are given for stakeholders seeking widespread rapid scale up of quality improvement initiatives to promote surgical safety worldwide.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19354
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000430
ORCID: 0000-0002-5118-1054
PubMed URL: 29225958
ISSN: 2059-7908
Type: Journal Article
Review
Subjects: health education and promotion
health systems evaluation
qualitative study
surgery
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.