Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19340
Title: Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical outcomes in Marfan patients undergoing aortic root surgery by composite-valve graft or valve sparing root replacement.
Authors: Flynn, Campbell D;Tian, David H;Wilson-Smith, Ashley;David, Tirone;Matalanis, George;Misfeld, Martin;Mastrobuoni, Stefano;El Khoury, Gebrine;Yan, Tristan D
Affiliation: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
Collaborative Research (CORE) Group, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Cardiac Surgery, Heart Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Saint Luc's Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
University of Sydney, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Issue Date: Nov-2017
Citation: Annals of cardiothoracic surgery 2017; 6(6): 570-581
Abstract: A major, life-limiting feature of Marfan syndrome (MFS) is the presence of aneurysmal disease. Cardiovascular intervention has dramatically improved the life expectancy of Marfan patients. Traditionally, the management of aortic root disease has been undertaken with composite-valve graft replacing the aortic valve and proximal aorta; more recently, valve sparing procedures have been developed to avoid the need for anticoagulation. This meta-analysis assesses the important surgical outcomes of the two surgical techniques. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies reporting the outcomes of aortic root surgery in Marfan patients with data extracted for outcomes of early and late mortality, thromboembolic events, late bleeding complications and surgical reintervention rates. The outcomes of 2,976 Marfan patients undergoing aortic root surgery were analysed, 1,624 patients were treated with composite valve graft (CVG) and 1,352 patients were treated with valve sparing root replacement (VSRR). When compared against CVG, VSRR was associated with reduced risk of thromboembolism (OR =0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.62, P=0.0008), late hemorrhagic complications (OR =0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.45; P=0.0003) and endocarditis (OR =0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.68; P=0.006). Importantly there was no significant difference in reintervention rates between VSRR and CVG (OR =0.89; 95% CI, 0.35-2.24; P=0.80). There is an increasing body of evidence that VSRR can be reliably performed in Marfan patients, resulting in a durable repair with no increased risk of re-operation compared to CVG, thus avoiding the need for systemic anticoagulation in selected patients.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19340
DOI: 10.21037/acs.2017.11.06
PubMed URL: 29270369
ISSN: 2225-319X
Type: Journal Article
Review
Subjects: Bentall
David procedure
Marfan syndrome (MFS)
composite valve graft (CVG)
total root replacement
valve sparing root
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.