Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Under-utilisation of high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in men with intermediate-high risk prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy.|
|Authors:||Ong, Wee Loon;Evans, Sue M;Millar, Jeremy L|
|Affiliation:||Department of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer and Wellness Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia|
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Alfred Health Radiation Oncology Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
|Citation:||Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology 2018; 62(2): 256-261|
|Abstract:||The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost with definitive external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in prostate cancer (CaP) management. The study population comprised men with intermediate-high risk CaP captured in the population-based Prostate Cancer Outcome Registry Victoria (PCOR-Vic), treated with EBRT from January 2010 to December 2015. The primary outcome is the proportion of men who received HDR-BT boost. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to evaluate the effect of patient-, tumour- and treatment-factors on the likelihood of HDR-BT use. Medicare Benefit Schedule (MBS) data was accessed to evaluate the Australia-wide pattern of HDR-BT use. One thousand eight hundred and six patients were included in this study - 886 (49%) intermediate-risk, and 920 (51%) high-risk CaP patients. Overall, only 124 (7%) patients had EBRT + HDR-BT - 47 (5%) intermediate-risk and 77 (8%) high-risk CaP patients (P = 0.01). There is higher proportion of patients who had HDR-BT in public institutions (7% public vs. 3% private, P = 0.005) and in metropolitan centres (9% metropolitan vs. 2% regional, P < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, older patients were less likely to have HDR-BT (OR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.89-0.94, P < 0.001), while patients with high-risk CaP (OR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.3-2.7; P = 0.002) treated in metropolitan centres (OR = 5.0; 95% CI = 2.6-9.8; P < 0.001) and public institutions (OR = 3.8; 95% CI = 1.5-9.4; P = 0.005) were more likely to have EBRT + HDR-BT. There was significant decline in numbers of HDR-BT performed throughout Australia, from 313 cases in 2010 to 125 cases in 2015. High-dose-rate brachytherapy is under-utilised with EBRT in this contemporary population-based cohort of Victorian men with CaP. The decline in HDR-BT use was also observed nationally.|
|Appears in Collections:||Journal articles|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.