Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18802
Title: Renal effects of an emergency department chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid strategy in patients admitted to hospital for more than 48 hours.
Authors: Yunos, Nor'azim Mohd;Bellomo, Rinaldo;Taylor, David McD;Judkins, Simon;Kerr, Fergus;Sutcliffe, Harvey;Hegarty, Colin;Bailey, Michael
Affiliation: Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
School of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of Emergency Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Department of Pathology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Dec-2017
EDate: 2017-06-08
Citation: Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA 2017-12; 29(6): 643-649
Abstract: Patients commonly receive i.v. fluids in the ED. It is still unclear whether the choice of i.v. fluids in this setting influences renal or patient outcomes. We aimed to assess the effects of restricting i.v. chloride administration in the ED on the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI). We conducted a before-and-after trial with 5008 consecutive ED-treated hospital admissions in the control period and 5146 consecutive admissions in the intervention period. During the control period (18 February 2008 to 17 August 2008), patients received standard i.v. fluids. During the intervention period (18 February 2009 to 17 August 2009), we restricted all chloride-rich fluids. We used the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) staging to define AKI. Stage 3 of KDIGO-defined AKI decreased from 54 (1.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.8-1.4) to 30 (0.6%; 95% CI 0.4-0.8) (P = 0.006). The rate of renal replacement therapy did not change, from 13 (0.3%; 95% CI 0.2-0.4) to 8 (0.2%; 95% CI 0.1-0.3) (P = 0.25). After adjustment for relevant covariates, liberal chloride therapy remained associated with a greater risk of KDIGO stage 3 (hazard ratio 1.82; 95% CI 1.13-2.95; P = 0.01). On sensitivity assessment after removing repeat admissions, KDIGO stage 3 remained significantly lower in the intervention period compared with the control period (P = 0.01). In a before-and-after trial, a chloride-restrictive strategy in an ED was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of stage 3 of KDIGO-defined AKI.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18802
DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12821
ORCID: 0000-0002-5890-4825
0000-0002-8986-9997
0000-0002-1650-8939
PubMed URL: 28597505
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: acute kidney injury
chloride
emergency department
saline
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.