Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18703
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGersak, Borut-
dc.contributor.authorFischlein, Theodor-
dc.contributor.authorFolliguet, Thierry A-
dc.contributor.authorMeuris, Bart-
dc.contributor.authorTeoh, Kevin H T-
dc.contributor.authorMoten, Simon C-
dc.contributor.authorSolinas, Marco-
dc.contributor.authorMiceli, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorOberwalder, Peter J-
dc.contributor.authorRambaldini, Manfredo-
dc.contributor.authorBhatnagar, Gopal-
dc.contributor.authorBorger, Michael A-
dc.contributor.authorBouchard, Denis-
dc.contributor.authorBouchot, Olivier-
dc.contributor.authorClark, Stephen C-
dc.contributor.authorDapunt, Otto E-
dc.contributor.authorFerrarini, Matteo-
dc.contributor.authorLaufer, Guenther-
dc.contributor.authorMignosa, Carmelo-
dc.contributor.authorMillner, Russell-
dc.contributor.authorNoirhomme, Philippe-
dc.contributor.authorPfeiffer, Steffen-
dc.contributor.authorRuyra-Baliarda, Xavier-
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, Malakh-
dc.contributor.authorSuri, Rakesh M-
dc.contributor.authorTroise, Giovanni-
dc.contributor.authorDiegeler, Anno-
dc.contributor.authorLaborde, Francois-
dc.contributor.authorLaskar, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorNajm, Hani K-
dc.contributor.authorGlauber, Mattia-
dc.date2015-10-29-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-30T06:48:30Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-30T06:48:30Z-
dc.date.issued2016-03-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery 2016; 49(3): 709-18-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18703-
dc.description.abstractAfter a panel process, recommendations on the use of sutureless and rapid deployment valves in aortic valve replacement were given with special respect as an alternative to stented valves. Thirty-one international experts in both sutureless, rapid deployment valves and stented bioprostheses constituted the panel. After a thorough literature review, evidence-based recommendations were rated in a three-step modified Delphi approach by the experts. Literature research could identify 67 clinical trials, 4 guidelines and 10 systematic reviews for detailed text analysis to obtain a total of 28 recommendations. After rating by the experts, 12 recommendations were identified and degree of consensus for each was determined. Proctoring and education are necessary for the introduction of sutureless valves on an institutional basis as well as for the individual training of surgeons. Sutureless and rapid deployment should be considered as the valve prosthesis of first choice for isolated procedures in patients with comorbidities, old age, delicate aortic wall conditions such as calcified root, porcelain aorta or prior implantation of aortic homograft and stentless valves as well as for concomitant procedures and small aortic roots to reduce cross-clamp time. Intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography is highly recommended, and in case of right anterior thoracotomy, preoperative computer tomography is strongly recommended. Suitable annular sizes are 19-27 mm. There is a contraindication for bicuspid valves only for Type 0 and for annular abscess or destruction due to infective endocarditis. Careful but complete decalcification of the aortic root is recommended to avoid paravalvular leakage; extensive decalcification should be avoided not to create annular defects. Proximal anastomoses of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting should be placed during a single aortic cross-clamp period or alternatively with careful side clamping. Available evidence suggests that the use of sutureless and rapid deployment valve is associated with (can translate into) reduced early complications such as prolonged ventilation, blood transfusion, atrial fibrillation, pleural effusions and renal replacement therapy, respectively, and may result in reduced intensive care unit and hospital stay in comparison with traditional valves. The international experts recommend various benefits of sutureless and rapid deployment technology, which may represent a helpful tool in aortic valve replacement for patients requiring a biological valve. However, further evidence will be needed to reaffirm the benefit of sutureless and rapid deployment valves.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAortic valve replacement-
dc.subjectRapid deployment valve-
dc.subjectRecommendations-
dc.subjectStented aortic valve prosthesis-
dc.subjectSutureless valve-
dc.titleSutureless, rapid deployment valves and stented bioprosthesis in aortic valve replacement: recommendations of an International Expert Consensus Panel.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery-
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Ljubljana School of Medicine and University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia-
dc.identifier.affiliationKlinikum Nuernberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany-
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre Hospitalo-Universitaire Brabois, Université de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France-
dc.identifier.affiliationU.Z. Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium-
dc.identifier.affiliationMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada-
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationOspedale del Cuore G. Pasquinucci, Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio, Massa, Italy-
dc.identifier.affiliationIstituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy-
dc.identifier.affiliationOspedale di Mantova, Mantua, Italy-
dc.identifier.affiliationTrillium Cardiovascular Associates, Mississauga, ON, Canada-
dc.identifier.affiliationColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA-
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada-
dc.identifier.affiliationCHU le Bocage, Dijon, France-
dc.identifier.affiliationFreeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK-
dc.identifier.affiliationMedical School Graz, Graz, Austria-
dc.identifier.affiliationIstituto Clinico Sant' Ambrogio, Milan, Italy-
dc.identifier.affiliationMedizinische Universitaet Wien, Vienna, Austria-
dc.identifier.affiliationOspedale Ferrarotto, Catania, Italy-
dc.identifier.affiliationBlackpool Victoria Hospital, Blackpool, UK-
dc.identifier.affiliationCliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Brussels, Belgium-
dc.identifier.affiliationHospital University Germans Trias I Pujol, Barcelona, Spain-
dc.identifier.affiliationMedizinischen Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany-
dc.identifier.affiliationMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA-
dc.identifier.affiliationFondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy-
dc.identifier.affiliationHerz- und Gefäß-Klinik Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany-
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France-
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity Hospital Dupuytren, Limoges, France-
dc.identifier.affiliationKing Fahad National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia-
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejcts/ezv369-
dc.identifier.pubmedid26516193-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.