Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18628
Title: Aggregated adverse-events outcomes in oncology phase III reports: A systematic review.
Authors: Maillet, Denis;Gan, Hui K;Blay, Jean-Yves;You, Benoit;Péron, Julien
Affiliation: CNRS UMR 5558, Biometry and Evolutionary Biology Laboratory, Health and Biostatistics Team, Villeurbanne, France
Medical Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), CITOHL, F-69310, Pierre-Bénite, France
School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia..
EMR UCBL/HCL 3738, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, F-69600, Oullins, France; Université de Lyon, F-69622, Lyon, France
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Biostatistics Unit, F-69003, Lyon, France
Medical Oncology Unit, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; EORTC, 83 Avenue Mounier, Bruxelles, Belgium
Issue Date: Jan-2016
EDate: 2015-11-27
Citation: European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) 2016; 52: 26-32
Abstract: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) represent a major source of information on treatment-related adverse events (AEs). In this study, we reviewed the use and the reporting methods of aggregated-AEs (A-AEs) outcomes in RCTs reports published in oncology and compared that to the expectations of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) membership. RCTs reports published between 2007 and 2011 were reviewed regarding the reporting of A-AEs-outcomes. A-AEs were defined as summary outcome combining several related AEs, usually grouped by organ system e.g. cardiac-AEs, dermatologic-AEs. Trial characteristics associated with the use of A-AEs outcomes were investigated. The expectation of EORTC members concerning A-AEs utilisation was queried through a survey. Among 325 RCTs published between 2007 and 2011, 94 (29%) included one or more A-AE outcomes. A clear description of the nature of AEs included in such aggregations was provided in 19 articles (20%). No description of A-AEs was conversely provided in the other 75 articles (80%). The most commonly used A-AEs-outcomes were dermatologic-AEs (45%) and cardiac-AEs (33%). In multivariate analysis, the use of A-AEs outcomes was more frequent when trials were conducted in Europe (p = 0.038) and in trials performed on colon/rectal cancers (p = 0.016). Finally, there is no consensus of EORTC members regarding the utilisation of A-AEs but a majority of them (88%) felt that a clear description of A-AEs should systematically be reported. The use of A-AEs is infrequent in oncology RCT manuscripts although their use is accepted by most clinicians. However, a clear definition of A-AEs is strongly recommended if they are to be used in order to avoid a loss of important details about drug toxicities that is useful to clinicians.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18628
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.08.025
PubMed URL: 26630531
Type: Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Subjects: Aggregated adverse events outcomes
EORTC
Methods
Neoplasms
Publishing standards
Randomised controlled trials as topic
Research designs
Research standards
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.