Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18254
Title: Is There Full or Proportional Somatosensory Recovery in the Upper Limb After Stroke? Investigating Behavioral Outcome and Neural Correlates.
Authors: Boccuni, Leonardo;Meyer, Sarah;Kessner, Simon S;De Bruyn, Nele;Essers, Bea;Cheng, Bastian;Thomalla, Götz;Peeters, André;Sunaert, Stefan;Duprez, Thierry;Marinelli, Lucio;Trompetto, Carlo;Thijs, Vincent N;Verheyden, Geert
Affiliation: KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
University of Genova, Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, Genova, Italy
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Neurology, Hamburg, German
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Department of Neurology, Brussels, Belgium
KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiology, Leuven, Belgium
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Department of Radiology, Brussels, Belgium
Department of Neuroscience, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
University of Melbourne, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Victoria, Australia
Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Aug-2018
EDate: 2018-07-10
Citation: Neurorehabilitation and neural repair 2018; 32(8): 691-700
Abstract: Proportional motor recovery in the upper limb has been investigated, indicating about 70% of the potential for recovery of motor impairment within the first months poststroke. To investigate whether the proportional recovery rule is applicable for upper-limb somatosensory impairment and to study underlying neural correlates of impairment and outcome at 6 months. A total of 32 patients were evaluated at 4 to 7 days and 6 months using the Erasmus MC modification of the revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (NSA) for impairment of (1) somatosensory perception (exteroception) and (2) passive somatosensory processing (sharp/blunt discrimination and proprioception); (3) active somatosensory processing was evaluated using the stereognosis component of the NSA. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained within 1 week poststroke, from which lesion load (LL) was calculated for key somatosensory tracts. Somatosensory perception fully recovered within 6 months. Passive and active somatosensory processing showed proportional recovery of 86% (95% CI = 79%-93%) and 69% (95% CI = 49%-89%), respectively. Patients with somatosensory impairment at 4 to 7 days showed significantly greater thalamocortical and insulo-opercular tracts (TCT and IOT) LL ( P < .05) in comparison to patients without impairment. Sensorimotor tract disruption at 4 to 7 days did not provide significant contribution above somatosensory processing score at 4 to 7 days when predicting somatosensory processing outcome at 6 months. Our sample of stroke patients assessed early showed full somatosensory perception but proportional passive and active somatosensory processing recovery. Disruption of both the TCT and IOT early after stroke appears to be a factor associated with somatosensory impairment but not outcome.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18254
DOI: 10.1177/1545968318787060
ORCID: 0000-0002-6614-8417
PubMed URL: 29991331
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: motor recovery
recovery from impairment
somatosensory recovery
stroke
upper extremity
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.