Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18212
Title: Evidence AGAINST A subcortical gate preventing conscious detection of respiratory load stimuli.
Authors: Ruehland, Warren R;Rochford, Peter D;Trinder, John;Spong, Jo;O'Donoghue, Fergal J
Affiliation: Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Department of Medicine, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 18-Aug-2018
EDate: 2018-08-18
Citation: Respiratory physiology & neurobiology 2018; online first: 18 August
Abstract: Respiratory related evoked potentials (RREP) were used to examine respiratory stimulus gating. RREPs produced by consciously detected vs. undetected loads, near the detection threshold, were compared. Participants (n = 17) were instrumented with EEG and a nasal mask connected to a loading manifold, which presented a range of mid-inspiratory resistive loads, plus a control, in a random block design. Participants were cued prior to the stimulus and signalled detection by a button press. There were statistically significant differences in peak-to-peak amplitude of the P1 RREP peak for detected (mean ± SD; 3.86 ± 1.45 µV; P =  0.020) and undetected loads (3.67 ± 1.27 µV; P =  0.002) vs. control (2.36 ± 0.81 µV), although baseline-to-peak differences were not significantly different. In contrast peak-to-peak P3 amplitude was significantly greater for detected (5.91 ± 1.54 µV; P <  0.001) but not undetected loads (3.33 ± 0.98 µV; P = 0.189) vs. control (3.69 ± 1.46 µV), with the same pattern observed for baseline-to-peak measurements. The P1 peak, thought to reflect arrival of somatosensory information, appeared to be present in response to both detected and undetected loads, but the later P3 peak, was present for detected loads only. This suggests that for sub-threshold loads sensory information may reach the cortex, arguing against a sub-cortical gating process.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18212
DOI: 10.1016/j.resp.2018.08.005
ORCID: 0000-0001-5099-3184
0000-0001-9626-7460
PubMed URL: 30130628
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Airway resistance
Load detection
Negative airway pressure
Respiratory related evoked potential (RREP)
Respiratory sensation
Respiratory stimulus gating
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.