Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||RDoC and shift of reference.|
|Authors:||Castro-de-Araujo, Luis Fs;Levy, Neil;Kanaan, Richard A|
|Affiliation:||Department of Psychiatry, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia|
CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasília, Brazil
Macquarie University, Department of Philosophy, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
|Citation:||Australasian psychiatry 2016; 24(5): 470-472|
|Abstract:||This paper aims to analyse in a philosophically informed way the recent National Institute of Mental Health proposal for the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework. Current classification systems have helped unify psychiatry and the conditions that it is most concerned with. However, by relying too much on syndromes and symptoms, they too often do not define stable constructs. As a result, inclusions and removals from the manuals are not always backed by sound reasons. The RDoC framework is an important move towards ameliorating matters. This paper argues that it improves the current situation by re-referencing constructs to physical properties (biomarkers for disorders, for example), by allowing theoretical levels within the framework, and by treating psychiatry as a special case of the cognitive sciences.|
|Subjects:||Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)|
|Appears in Collections:||Journal articles|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.