Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17155
Title: DNA methylation profiling of genomic DNA isolated from urine in diabetic chronic kidney disease: A pilot study.
Authors: Lecamwasam, Ashani;Sexton-Oates, Alexandra;Carmody, Jake;Ekinci, Elif I;Dwyer, Karen M;Saffery, Richard
Affiliation: Clinical and Disease Epigenetics Group, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Victoria, Australia
Department of Endocrinology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Deakin University, Victoria, Australia..
Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 2018
EDate: 2018-02-20
Citation: PloS one 2018; 13(2): e0190280
Abstract: To characterise the genomic DNA (gDNA) yield from urine and quality of derived methylation data generated from the widely used Illuminia Infinium MethylationEPIC (HM850K) platform and compare this with buffy coat samples. DNA methylation is the most widely studied epigenetic mark and variations in DNA methylation profile have been implicated in diabetes which affects approximately 415 million people worldwide. QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit and QIAamp DNA micro kit were used to extract DNA from frozen and fresh urine samples as well as increasing volumes of fresh urine. Matched buffy coats to the frozen urine were also obtained and DNA was extracted from the buffy coats using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit. Genomic DNA of greater concentration than 20μg/ml were used for methylation analysis using the HM850K array. Irrespective of extraction technique or the use of fresh versus frozen urine samples, limited genomic DNA was obtained using a starting sample volume of 5ml (0-0.86μg/mL). In order to optimize the yield, we increased starting volumes to 50ml fresh urine, which yielded only 0-9.66μg/mL A different kit, QIAamp DNA Micro Kit, was trialled in six fresh urine samples and ten frozen urine samples with inadequate DNA yields from 0-17.7μg/mL and 0-1.6μg/mL respectively. Sufficient genomic DNA was obtained from only 4 of the initial 41 frozen urine samples (10%) for DNA methylation profiling. In comparison, all four buffy coat samples (100%) provided sufficient genomic DNA. High quality data can be obtained provided a sufficient yield of genomic DNA is isolated. Despite optimizing various extraction methodologies, the modest amount of genomic DNA derived from urine, may limit the generalisability of this approach for the identification of DNA methylation biomarkers of chronic diabetic kidney disease.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17155
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190280
ORCID: 0000-0002-1960-2242
0000-0003-2372-395X
PubMed URL: 29462136
PubMed URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29462136
Type: Journal Article
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.