Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16844
Title: Prospective comparative effectiveness cohort study comparing two models of advance care planning provision for Australian community aged care clients
Authors: Detering, Karen Margaret;Carter, Rachel Zoe;Sellars, Marcus William;Lewis, Virginia;Sutton, Elizabeth Anne
Issue Date: 16-Sep-2017
Citation: BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 2017; online first: 16 September
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Conduct a prospective comparative effectiveness cohort study comparing two models of advance care planning (ACP) provision in community aged care: ACP conducted by the client's case manager (CM) ('Facilitator') and ACP conducted by an external ACP service ('Referral') over a 6-month period. METHODS: This Australian study involved CMs and their clients. Eligible CM were English speaking, ≥18 years, had expected availability for the trial and worked ≥3 days per week. CMs were recruited via their organisations, sequentially allocated to a group and received education based on the group allocation. They were expected to initiate ACP with all clients and to facilitate ACP or refer for ACP. Outcomes were quantity of new ACP conversations and quantity and quality of new advance care directives (ACDs). RESULTS: 30 CMs (16 Facilitator, 14 Referral) completed the study; all 784 client's files (427 Facilitator, 357 Referral) were audited. ACP was initiated with 508 (65%) clients (293 Facilitator, 215 Referral; p<0.05); 89 (18%) of these (53 Facilitator, 36 Referral) and 41 (46%) (13 Facilitator, 28 Referral; p<0.005) completed ACDs. Most ACDs (71%) were of poor quality/not valid. A further 167 clients (facilitator 124; referral 43; p<0.005) reported ACP was in progress at study completion. CONCLUSIONS: While there were some differences, overall, models achieved similar outcomes. ACP was initiated with 65% of clients. However, fewer clients completed ACP, there was low numbers of ACDs and document quality was generally poor. The findings raise questions for future implementation and research into community ACP provision.
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16844
DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001372
PubMed URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28918387
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Advance care directive
Advance care planning
Community aged care
Home care packages
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.