Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/13534
Title: How good is the radial artery as a bypass graft?
Authors: Buxton, Brian F;Windsor, M;Komeda, M;Gaer, J;Fuller, J;Liu, J
Affiliation: University of Melbourne, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Austin & Repatriation Medical Centre, Australia.
Issue Date: 4-Mar-1997
Citation: Coronary Artery Disease; 8(3-4): 225-33
Abstract: The radial artery is being used with increasing frequency to replace the saphenous vein as a coronary artery bypass graft, on the basis of the belief that it will provide improved long-term patency. Innovative techniques in assessing the ulnar collateral circulation to the hand continue to evolve, giving comfort to the surgeon. Several centres have confirmed that the early results of surgery using the radial artery are similar to those using conventional grafts. Few late graft patency results or clinical data have been reported. Unresolved issues, such as the importance of pathological changes in the radial artery, the prevention of spasm, and the hypoperfusion syndrome, lurk in the background. The role of the radial artery continues to evolve.
Internal ID Number: 9237033
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/13534
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9237033
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Coronary Artery Bypass.methods.mortality.standards
Coronary Disease.surgery
Graft Survival
Humans
Radial Artery.cytology.physiology.surgery
Survival Rate
Vasoconstriction
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.