Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12740
Title: Complementary and alternative medicine use among paediatric emergency department patients.
Authors: Taylor, David McD;Dhir, Reetika;Craig, Simon S;Lammers, Thalia;Gardiner, Kaya;Hunter, Kirrily;Joffe, Paul;Krieser, David;Babl, Franz E
Affiliation: Department of Emergency Medicine, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Emergency Department, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Emergency Department, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Emergency Department, Sunshine Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 14-Apr-2015
Citation: Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 2015; 51(9): 895-900
Abstract: To determine the period prevalence and nature of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among paediatric emergency department (ED) patients and the perceptions of CAM among the CAM administrators.A survey was undertaken in four Victorian EDs (January to September 2013). A convenience sample of parents/carers accompanying paediatric patients completed a self-administered questionnaire. The main outcome measures were CAM use and perceptions of CAM.The parents/carers of 883 patients participated. Three hundred eighty-eight (43.9%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 40.6-47.3) and 53 (6.0%, 95% CI 4.6-7.8) patients had taken a CAM within the previous 12 months and on the day of presentation, respectively. There were no gender differences between CAM users and non-users (P = 0.83). The use of CAM was significantly more common among older patients (P < 0.001), those with European ethnicity (P = 0.046) and among those with chronic disease (P < 0.01). Fish oil, garlic, chamomile and acidophilus were the most commonly used CAM. Only 4.4% of CAM use was reported to the ED doctor. There were reports of potentially dangerous CAM use (St John's wort, ginseng). Parents/carers who had administered CAM were more likely to report that CAMs are safe, drug free and could prevent illness (P < 0.01). In addition, a number of this group reported that CAMs are more effective than prescription medicines and safe when taken with prescription medicines.CAM use is common among paediatric ED patients although rarely reported to the ED doctor. Parents/carers who administer CAM have differing perceptions of CAM safety from those who do not.
Internal ID Number: 25872659
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12740
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.12898
ORCID: 0000-0002-8986-9997
0000-0002-7173-6993
PubMed URL: 25872659
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: alternative medicine
child
complementary medicine
emergency department
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.