Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Detecting cognitive impairment after concussion: sensitivity of change from baseline and normative data methods using the CogSport/Axon cognitive test battery.|
|Authors:||Louey, Andrea G;Cromer, Jason A;Schembri, Adrian J;Darby, David G;Maruff, Paul;Makdissi, Michael;Mccrory, Paul|
|Affiliation:||The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne Brain Centre - Austin Campus, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia Centre For Health Exercise and Sports Medicine, Melbourne Physiotherapy Department, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia|
CogState Ltd., Melbourne, VIC, Australia
CogState Ltd., Melbourne, VIC, Australia Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne Brain Centre - Austin Campus, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
CogState Ltd., Melbourne, VIC, Australia The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne Brain Centre - Austin Campus, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia firstname.lastname@example.org.
|Citation:||Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology : the Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists 2014; 29(5): 432-41|
|Abstract:||Concussion-related cognitive impairments are typically evaluated with repeated neuropsychological assessments where post-injury performances are compared with pre-injury baseline data (baseline method). Many cases of concussions, however, are evaluated in the absence of baseline data by comparing post-injury performances with normative data (normative method). This study aimed to compare the sensitivity and specificity of these two methods using the CogSport/Axon test battery. Normative data and reliable change indices were computed from a non-injured athlete sample (n = 235). Test-retest data from non-injured (n = 260) and recently concussed (n = 29) athlete samples were then used to compare the two methods. The baseline method was found to be more sensitive than the normative method, and both methods had high specificity and overall correct classification rates. This suggests that while the normative method identifies most cases of recent concussions, the baseline method remains a more precise approach to assessing concussion-related cognitive impairments.|
|Internal ID Number:||24813184|
Analysis of Variance
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Severity of Illness Index
|Appears in Collections:||Journal articles|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.