Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12138
Title: Impact of socioeconomic status and rurality on early outcomes and mid-term survival after CABG: insights from a multicentre registry.
Authors: Shi, William Y;Yap, Cheng-Hon;Newcomb, Andrew E;Hayward, Philip A R;Tran, Lavinia;Reid, Christopher M;Smith, Julian A
Affiliation: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Geelong Hospital, Australia; Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia. Electronic address: cheng-hon.yap@monash.edu.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Australia; Cardiovascular Research Centre, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Monash Health, and Department of Surgery (MMC), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Issue Date: 28-Feb-2014
Citation: Heart, Lung & Circulation 2014; 23(8): 726-36
Abstract: We examined whether socioeconomic status and rurality influenced outcomes after coronary surgery.We identified 14,150 patients undergoing isolated coronary surgery. Socioeconomic and rurality data was obtained from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and linked to patients' postcodes. Outcomes were compared between categories of socioeconomic disadvantage (highest versus lowest quintiles, n= 3150 vs. 2469) and rurality (major cities vs. remote, n=9598 vs. 839).Patients from socioeconomically-disadvantaged areas experienced a greater burden of cardiovascular risk factors including diabetes, obesity and current smoking. Thirty-day mortality (disadvantaged 1.6% vs. advantaged 1.6%, p>0.99) was similar between groups as was late survival (7 years: 83±0.9% vs. 84±1.0%, p=0.79). Those from major cities were less likely to undergo urgent surgery. There was similar 30-day mortality (major cities: 1.6% vs. remote: 1.5%, p=0.89). Patients from major cities experienced improved survival at seven years (84±0.5% vs. 79±2.0%, p=0.010). Propensity-analysis did not show socioeconomic status or rurality to be associated with late outcomes.Patients presenting for coronary artery surgery from different socioeconomic and geographic backgrounds exhibit differences in their clinical profile. Patients from more rural and remote areas appear to experience poorer long-term survival, though this may be partially driven by the population's clinical profile.
Internal ID Number: 24657281
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12138
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.02.008
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24657281
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Coronary artery bypass
Coronary artery disease
Rurality
Socioeconomic disadvantage
Surgery
Aged, 80 and over
Coronary Artery Bypass
Coronary Artery Disease.mortality.surgery
Disease-Free Survival
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Registries
Retrospective Studies
Rural Population
Socioeconomic Factors
Survival Rate
Urban Population
Victoria.epidemiology
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.