Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Surgical treatment of isolated type II superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesions: repair versus biceps tenodesis.|
|Authors:||Ek, Eugene T H;Shi, Lewis L;Tompson, Jeffrey D;Freehill, Michael T;Warner, Jon J P|
|Affiliation:||Melbourne Orthopaedic Group and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Melbourne, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.|
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL, USA.
Harvard Shoulder Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Sports and Shoulder Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Harvard Shoulder Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: firstname.lastname@example.org.
|Citation:||Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et Al.] 2014; 23(7): 1059-65|
|Abstract:||It is still unclear which patients with isolated type II superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesions benefit from either superior labral repair or biceps tenodesis. This study evaluates the indications and outcomes of patients with isolated type II SLAP lesions who have undergone either procedure.A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who had surgery for an isolated type II SLAP lesion between 2008 and 2011. There were 25 patients: 15 underwent biceps tenodesis, with a mean follow-up of 31 months (range, 26-43 months), and 10 underwent SLAP repair, with a mean follow-up of 35 months (range, 25-52 months). The mean age was 47 years (range, 30-59 years) in the tenodesis group and 31 years (range, 21-43 years) in the repair group.At latest follow-up, both groups showed significant improvements in subjective shoulder value and pain score. No difference was observed in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (93.0 vs 93.5, P = .45), patient satisfaction (93% vs 90%, P = .45), or return to preinjury sporting level (73% vs 60%, P = .66). Analysis of the indications for treatment showed that in the large majority, tenodesis was performed in older patients (>35 years) and patients who showed degenerative or frayed labrums whereas SLAP repairs were performed in younger and more active patients with healthy-appearing labral tissue. There was only 1 failure in the tenodesis group, and in the SLAP repair group, there were 2 cases of postoperative stiffness; all were treated nonoperatively.In this study, we show that both biceps tenodesis and SLAP repair can provide good to excellent results if performed in appropriately selected patients with isolated type II SLAP lesions.|
|Internal ID Number:||24388713|
superior labral repair
Soft Tissue Injuries.surgery
|Appears in Collections:||Journal articles|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.