Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12008
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEastwood, Glenn Men
dc.contributor.authorPeck, Leahen
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Helenen
dc.contributor.authorSuzuki, Satoshien
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Mercedesen
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldoen
dc.date2013-12-24-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:38:38Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:38:38Z-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Critical Care 2013; 27(3): 120-5en
dc.identifier.govdoc24369915en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/12008en
dc.description.abstractIn the ICU, SpO2≥96% are regularly targeted implying that more oxygen may be given than desirable. To reduce exposure to hyperoxia a conservative oxygen therapy protocol (targeted SpO2 90-92% using lowest FiO2) for mechanically ventilated patients was introduced in a single tertiary ICU in September 2012.To describe intensive care clinicians' opinion of conservative oxygen therapy for mechanically ventilated adult patients.A structured multi-choice questionnaire of intensive care clinicians was conducted between February and March 2013.Responses were received from 90 staff members: 81 intensive care nurses and 9 medical doctors. A majority of respondents (60.7%) considered oxygen related lung injury as 'a major concern'. Most respondents (81/89; 91.1%) felt conservative oxygen therapy was easy to perform and few respondents (6/88; 8%) considered performing conservative oxygen therapy to be stressful. Most respondents (58%) reported not performing more arterial blood gases to monitor PaO2 during conservative oxygen therapy and 90% (81/90) of respondents indicated a desire to continue conservative oxygen therapy. Free text comments indicated adoption of this protocol was a paradigm shift yet more education and research to elucidate the benefits/harm of lower oxygen saturation targeting is needed.Intensive care clinicians readily accepted the introduction of a conservative oxygen therapy protocol into their practice. Most respondents found conservative oxygen therapy easy and not stressful to perform. Further evaluation the administration of oxygen therapy, its management by intensive care clinicians and possible impact on outcome for mechanically ventilated patients appears well accepted by clinical staff.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherHyperoxiaen
dc.subject.otherIntensive careen
dc.subject.otherMechanical ventilationen
dc.subject.otherOxygen administrationen
dc.subject.otherOxygen therapyen
dc.titleIntensive care clinicians' opinion of conservative oxygen therapy (SpO₂ 90-92%) for mechanically ventilated patients.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAustralian Critical Careen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg. Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aucc.2013.11.004en
dc.description.pages120-5en
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369915en
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.