Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Bringing rigour to translational medicine.|
|Authors:||Howells, David William;Sena, Emily S;Macleod, Malcolm R|
|Affiliation:||Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, 245 Burgundy Street, Heidelberg, Vic 3084, Australia.|
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
|Citation:||Nature Reviews. Neurology 2013; 10(1): 37-43|
|Abstract:||Translational neuroscience is in the doldrums. The stroke research community was among the first to recognize that the motivations inherent in our system of research can cause investigators to take shortcuts, and can introduce bias and reduce generalizability, all of which leads ultimately to the recurrent failure of apparently useful drug candidates in clinical trials. Here, we review the evidence for these problems in stroke research, where they have been most studied, and in other translational research domains, which seem to be bedevilled by the same issues. We argue that better scientific training and simple changes to the way that we fund, assess and publish research findings could reduce wasted investment, speed drug development, and create a healthier research environment. For 'phase III' preclinical studies--that is, those studies that build the final justification for conducting a clinical trial--we argue for a need to apply the same attention to detail, experimental rigour and statistical power in our animal experiments as in the clinical trials themselves.|
|Internal ID Number:||24247324|
Translational Medical Research
|Appears in Collections:||Journal articles|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.