Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11896
Title: Pharmacist consultations in general practice clinics: the Pharmacists in Practice Study (PIPS).
Authors: Tan, Edwin C K;Stewart, Kay;Elliott, Rohan A;George, Johnson
Affiliation: Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, Studley Rd., Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia.
Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 381 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia. Electronic address: Johnson.George@monash.edu.
Issue Date: 2-Oct-2013
Citation: Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy : Rsap 2013; 10(4): 623-32
Abstract: Medication-related problems (MRPs) are a concern in primary care settings. Pharmacists based in the community or community pharmacies are able to identify, resolve and prevent MRPs; however, the lack of a formal partnership with physicians and poor access to patients' medical records are limitations. In Australia, delivery of pharmacist services within general practice clinics is rare.To evaluate the effectiveness of consultations by pharmacists based within primary care medical practices.A prospective, before-after intervention study was conducted at two primary health care (general practice) clinics in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were clinic patients who had risk-factors for MRPs (e.g. polypharmacy). Patients received a consultation with the pharmacist in a private consulting room at the clinic or in their home. The pharmacist reviewed the patient's medication regimen and adherence, with full access to their medical record, provided patient education, and produced a report for the general practitioner. The primary outcome was the number of MRPs identified by the pharmacist, and the number that remained unresolved 6 months after the pharmacist consultation. Secondary outcomes included medication adherence, health service use, and patient satisfaction.Eighty-two patients were recruited and 62 (75.6%) completed the study. The median number of MRPs per patient identified by the practice pharmacist was 2 (interquartile range [IQR] 1, 4). Six months after review, this fell to 0 (IQR 0, 1), P < 0.001. The proportion of patients who were adherent to their medications improved significantly, according to both the Morisky (44.1% versus 62.7%, P = 0.023) and the Tool for Adherence Behaviour Screening (TABS) (35.6% versus 57.6%, P = 0.019) scales. There was no significant effect on health service use. Patients were highly satisfied with the pharmacist consultations.Consultations undertaken by pharmacists located within primary health care clinics were effective in identifying and resolving MRPs. The consultations were well received by patients and were associated with improvements in medication adherence.
Internal ID Number: 24095088
URI: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11896
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.08.005
URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24095088
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: General practice
Medication reviews
Pharmaceutical care
Pharmacists
Primary health care
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Female
Follow-Up Studies
General Practice.methods.standards.trends
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pharmaceutical Services.standards.trends
Pharmacists.standards.trends
Professional Role
Prospective Studies
Referral and Consultation.standards.trends
Victoria
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.