Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11480
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBlennerhassett, Jannette Men
dc.contributor.authorDite, Wayneen
dc.contributor.authorRamage, Emily Ren
dc.contributor.authorRichmond, Meagan Een
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T01:05:33Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-16T01:05:33Z-
dc.date.issued2012-04-17en
dc.identifier.citationArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012; 93(10): 1782-7en
dc.identifier.govdoc22522218en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11480en
dc.description.abstractTo investigate (1) whether clinical test scores at discharge predict falls or limited community mobility after discharge from inpatient stroke rehabilitation; and (2) how walking and dynamic standing balance change after discharge.Follow-up observational study between 6 and 36 months after discharge.Rehabilitation setting.Community-dwelling stroke survivors (N=30) who could walk unassisted when discharged from inpatient rehabilitation.Not applicable.Six-minute walk test (6MWT), Four Square Step Test (FSST), Step Test (ST), Environmental Analysis of Mobility Questionnaire (EAMQ), Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), and self-reported falls.Follow-up occurred at a median of 14.5 months postdischarge. Significant improvements occurred between discharge and follow-up for the 6MWT (mean difference [MD]=110.1m; 95% confidence interval [CI], 70.8-149.4; P<.001), ST (MD=1.8 steps; 95% CI, 0.3-3.4; P=.03), and FSST (MD=4.3s; 95% CI, -10.3 to 1.6; P=.05). Despite this, 40% of participants reported falling. The group who fell had lower clinical test scores at discharge and follow-up than nonfallers. Specific cutoff scores for the clinical tests accurately classified falls history in 70% to 78% of participants. The cutoff scores were <250m for the 6MWT, <10 steps on the ST, and a failure or ≥15 seconds to complete the FSST. Participants performing under the cutoff scores reported lower levels of community mobility (EAMQ, P<.04). Concern about falling was only higher for those classified at risk by the FSST (FES-I, P=.008).The FSST, ST, and 6MWT scores at discharge had good falls prediction. People classified at risk of falls avoided more tasks in their home and community than those not classified at risk.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAccidental Falls.prevention & controlen
dc.subject.otherActivities of Daily Livingen
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherChi-Square Distributionen
dc.subject.otherDisability Evaluationen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherFollow-Up Studiesen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherMobility Limitationen
dc.subject.otherPostural Balance.physiologyen
dc.subject.otherPredictive Value of Testsen
dc.subject.otherQuestionnairesen
dc.subject.otherSensitivity and Specificityen
dc.subject.otherStroke.rehabilitationen
dc.subject.otherWalking.physiologyen
dc.titleChanges in balance and walking from stroke rehabilitation to the community: a follow-up observational study.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitationen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Physiotherapy, Austin Health, Royal Talbot Rehabilitation Centre, Austin Health, Kew, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.005en
dc.description.pages1782-7en
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22522218en
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.