Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11390
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLawrentschuk, Nathan Len
dc.contributor.authorSasges, Deborahen
dc.contributor.authorTasevski, Roberten
dc.contributor.authorAbouassaly, Roberten
dc.contributor.authorScott, Andrew Men
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Ian Den
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T00:58:51Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T00:58:51Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-07en
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Surgical Oncology 2011; 19(3): 706-13en
dc.identifier.govdoc22146882en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11390en
dc.description.abstractOncologic Internet information quality is considered variable, but no comprehensive analysis exists to support this. We compared the quality of common malignancy Web sites to assess them for language or disease differences and to perform a quality comparison between medical and layperson terminology.World Health Organization Health on the Net (HON) principles may be applied to Web sites by using an automated toolbar function. We used the Google search engine ( http://www.google.com ) to assess 10,200 Web sites using the keywords "Breast," "Colorectal," "Stomach," "Liver," "Pancreas," "Bile Duct," "Melanoma," and "Thyroid," plus "cancer," in English, French, German, and Spanish. The searches were then repeated with alternative terms, such as "Bowel" and "Skin cancer."Less than a quarter of Web sites are HON accredited, with significant differences by malignancy type (P < 0.0001), language (P < 0.0001), and tertiles of the first 150 Web sites returned (P < 0.0001). French-language queries resulted in the most accredited Web sites returned. The use of alternative terms resulted in marked differences in accredited Web sites for hepatobiliary cancers.A lack of validation of most oncologic sites is present, with discrepancies in the quality and number of Web sites across diseases and languages, as well as medical and alternative terms. Physicians should encourage and participate in the development of informative, ethical, and reliable health Web sites on the Internet and direct patients to them.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherInformation Services.standardsen
dc.subject.otherInternet.standardsen
dc.subject.otherMultilingualismen
dc.subject.otherNeoplasmsen
dc.subject.otherPatient Education as Topic.standardsen
dc.subject.otherQuality Controlen
dc.subject.otherSearch Engineen
dc.subject.otherWorld Health Organizationen
dc.titleOncology health information quality on the Internet: a multilingual evaluation.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnnals of surgical oncologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationLudwig Institute for Cancer Research, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationlawrentschuk@gmail.comen
dc.identifier.doi10.1245/s10434-011-2137-xen
dc.description.pages706-13en
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22146882en
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
22146882.pdf54.51 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.