Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11384
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWan, Lien
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldoen
dc.contributor.authorMay, Clive Nen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T00:58:28Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T00:58:28Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-01en
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care and Resuscitation; 13(4): 262-70en
dc.identifier.govdoc22129288en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11384en
dc.description.abstractFluid resuscitation with saline in severe sepsis is controversial. Hypertonic (3%) saline (HTS) may be superior to normal (0.9%) saline (NS).To compare the effects of HTS and NS on regional blood flow in sepsis.Randomised controlled crossover large animal study.University physiology laboratory.Seven merino cross ewes.We implanted chronic flow probes around aorta, mesenteric, coronary and renal arteries. Sepsis was induced by the intravenous injection of 3 &times; 109 colonyforming units of live Escherichia coli. We randomised animals to three groups after onset of sepsis: observation (control), NS (1000 mL over 15 minutes) and HTS (300 mL over 15 minutes).Continuously measured systemic haemodynamics, organ blood flows and markers of renal function for 210 minutes.In septic sheep, bolus resuscitation with HTS had similar systemic haemodynamic effects as NS and both increased cardiac output and mesenteric blood flow during the first hour compared with control (P < 0.05). However, this effect dissipated after 60 minutes. These effects were mirrored by effects on mesenteric and coronary blood flow. In contrast, renal blood flow was not changed by either HTS or NS. HTS transiently increased total and mesenteric oxygen delivery (P < 0.05), while NS transiently decreased total and renal oxygen delivery. Urine output and creatinine clearance decreased with sepsis and only transiently increased with NS (P < 0.05) but not HTS.In gram-negative sepsis, bolus resuscitation with HTS and NS have similar and transient systemic and regional haemodynamic effects, but no effects on renal perfusion and only short-lived effects on renal function. These findings challenge the physiological rationale for fluid bolus resuscitation in sepsis.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAnimalsen
dc.subject.otherBlood Pressureen
dc.subject.otherCardiac Output.drug effectsen
dc.subject.otherCross-Over Studiesen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherGram-Negative Bacterial Infections.therapyen
dc.subject.otherHeart Rateen
dc.subject.otherHemodynamics.drug effectsen
dc.subject.otherKidney.blood supplyen
dc.subject.otherOsmolar Concentrationen
dc.subject.otherRegional Blood Flowen
dc.subject.otherResuscitationen
dc.subject.otherSaline Solution, Hypertonic.administration & dosageen
dc.subject.otherSepsis.therapyen
dc.subject.otherSheepen
dc.subject.otherSodium Chloride.administration & dosageen
dc.titleBolus hypertonic or normal saline resuscitation in gram-negative sepsis: systemic and regional haemodynamic effects in sheep.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleCritical Care and Resuscitationen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, Australiaen
dc.description.pages262-70en
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22129288en
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.