Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11309
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStory, David Aen
dc.contributor.authorGin, Veronicaen
dc.contributor.authorna Ranong, Vanidaen
dc.contributor.authorPoustie, Stephanie Jen
dc.contributor.authorJones, Daryl Aen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T00:53:55Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T00:53:55Z
dc.date.issued2011-07-21en
dc.identifier.citationAnesthesia and Analgesia 2011; 113(3): 591-5en
dc.identifier.govdoc21778334en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11309en
dc.description.abstractAs with other types of research, there are concerns about reporting of survey research in anesthesia journals. We hypothesized that use of survey reporting items would be inconsistent in survey research reported in anesthesia journals.After a literature review we constructed a 17-item reporting list for a limited systematic review of survey reporting in 6 anesthesia journals. We identified survey reports by MEDLINE (PubMed) search for January 2000 to April 2009.The initial search identified 347 publications. Of these, we excluded 107 because they were not questionnaire surveys (often audits), were reviews, or were letters. We therefore identified 240 surveys published as full survey reports. From the 17-item reporting list, the median number of items recorded was 9 (interquartile range: 7 to 10; range 2 to 15). The number (and percentage) of surveys reporting specific items ranged widely for different items: from 9 surveys (4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2% to 7%) for sample size to 240 surveys (100%; 95% CI: 98% to 100%) for response rate. In addition to sample size, the 5 least frequently reported items included the following: reporting confidence intervals, 21 surveys (9%; 95% CI: 6% to 13%); stating a hypothesis, 23 of 240 surveys (10%; 95% CI: 7% to 14%); accounting for nonresponders, 61 surveys (25%; 95% CI: 20% to 31%); and survey design, 67 surveys (28%; 95% CI: 33% to 34%).Inconsistent reporting may compromise the transparency and reproducibility of survey reports.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAnesthesia.standardsen
dc.subject.otherBibliometricsen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherPeriodicals as Topic.standardsen
dc.subject.otherQuality Controlen
dc.subject.otherQuestionnaires.standardsen
dc.subject.otherReproducibility of Resultsen
dc.titleInconsistent survey reporting in anesthesia journals.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnesthesia and analgesiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDavid.Story@austin.org.auen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia, Austin Hospital, Studley Rd., Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182264aafen
dc.description.pages591-5en
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21778334en
dc.contributor.corpauthorANZCA Trials Groupen
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.