Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Selecting appropriate voxel-based methods for neuroimaging studies.|
|Authors:||Abbott, David F;Pell, Gaby S;Pardoe, Heath R;Jackson, Graeme D|
|Affiliation:||Florey Neuroscience Institutes, Melbourne Brain Centre, Austin Hospital, Victoria, Australia. BRI@brain.org.au|
|Citation:||Neuroimage 2011; 59(2): 885-6|
|Abstract:||We highlight a fundamental difference between voxel-based methods that interrogate signal intensity directly and those that interrogate morphometric features; we discuss how signal intensity changes might erroneously affect morphometric measures, and we provide some guidance for selection of appropriate methods to address particular hyphotheses. Our discussion is motivated by a recent application of voxel-based morphometry methods to T2-weighted images (T2-Voxel Based Morphometry; T2-VBM). In this context we discuss alternative approaches including Voxel-Based T2-Relaxometry (VBR) and Voxel Based Iterative Sensitivity analysis of T2-Weighted Images (VBIS-T2).|
|Internal ID Number:||21763436|
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted.methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging.methods
|Appears in Collections:||Journal articles|
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.