Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11090
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCalzavacca, Paoloen
dc.contributor.authorLicari, Elisaen
dc.contributor.authorTee, Augustineen
dc.contributor.authorMercer, Ingaen
dc.contributor.authorHaase, Michaelen
dc.contributor.authorHaase-Fielitz, Anjaen
dc.contributor.authorJones, Daryl Aen
dc.contributor.authorGutteridge, Geoffrey Aen
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldoen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T00:40:39Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T00:40:39Z
dc.date.issued2010-07-29en
dc.identifier.citationResuscitation 2010; 81(11): 1509-15en
dc.identifier.govdoc20673606en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/11090en
dc.description.abstractThere is no information on the clinical features and outcome of patients receiving multiple Medical Emergency Team (MET) reviews. Accordingly, we studied the characteristics and outcome of patients receiving one MET call and compared them with those receiving multiple MET reviews.Retrospective observational study using prospectively collected data.Tertiary hospital.Cohort of 1664 patients receiving 2237 MET reviews over a 2-year period.We retrieved information about patient demographics, reasons for MET review, procedures performed by the MET and hospital outcome. We found that 1290 (77.5%) patients received a single MET review and 374 (22.5%) received multiple MET reviews (mean 2.5 reviews, median 2.0). Multiple MET reviews were more likely to be in surgical patients (p < 0.001) and to be due to arrhythmias (p = 0.016). Multiple MET review patients were more likely to be admitted for gastrointestinal diseases (p < 0.001), had a 50% longer hospital stay (p < 0.001) and a 34.6% increase in hospital mortality (p < 0.001) compared to single MET review patients. Their odds ratio (OR) for mortality was 2.14 (95% C.I.: 1.62-2.83; p < 0.001). After exclusion of patients with not for resuscitation (NFR) orders, the OR for mortality was 2.92 (95% C.I.: 2.10-4.06; p < 0.001). The in-hospital mortality of patients subject to multiple MET reviews who were not designated NFR was 34.1%, but only 9.7% of these deaths occurred within 48 h of the initial MET review.In our hospital, one fifth of patients receiving MET calls are subject to multiple MET calls. Such patients have identifiable features and have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Within any rapid response system, such patients should be recognized as a higher risk group and receive specific additional attention.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherChi-Square Distributionen
dc.subject.otherEmergency Treatment.standardsen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHospital Mortalityen
dc.subject.otherHospital Rapid Response Team.organization & administrationen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherRetrospective Studiesen
dc.subject.otherStatistics, Nonparametricen
dc.subject.otherSyndromeen
dc.subject.otherTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subject.otherVital Signsen
dc.titleFeatures and outcome of patients receiving multiple Medical Emergency Team reviews.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleResuscitationen
dc.identifier.affiliationpaolo.calzavacca@austin.org.auen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.06.017en
dc.description.pages1509-15en
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20673606en
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.