Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10753
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWeerakoon, Maheshaen
dc.contributor.authorLawrentschuk, Nathan Len
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-16T00:18:08Z
dc.date.available2015-05-16T00:18:08Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-19en
dc.identifier.citationBJU International 2009; 103(9): 1206-9en
dc.identifier.govdoc19154512en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10753en
dc.description.abstractTo address the usability and safety aspects of current equipment for indwelling urinary catheter (IDC) manipulation, by assessing the attitudes of doctors and nurses to infection control, occupational health and environmental waste, and the perceived adequacy of available catheter packs, particularly drapes, when performing such manipulations.A self-administered survey instrument was created using an online database and completed by doctors and nurses. The survey covered basic demographics and experience with IDC, attitudes to infection control, occupational health and safety, and the environment, as well as adequacy of current equipment in containing spillage of urine and/or blood.In all, 87 doctors and 228 nurses completed 315 of 350 (90%) surveys. Doctors and nurses were concerned about infection control, occupational health and safety issues, and environmental waste. Incidents involving spillage of urine and/or blood often go unreported. There were no differences between nurses and doctors having specialist training in urology or experience (P > 0.05). The second major finding is that available catheter packs, particularly drapes, when manipulating IDCs, are inadequate and spillage is likely. These findings were more pronounced in doctors and those with urology training (P < 0.05).The attitudes of health professionals involved with IDC manipulations are consistent with other fields, as is the under-reporting of episodes of contamination by bodily fluids. The current equipment, particularly drapes, are inadequate for containing urine and blood, leading to infection control, occupational health, environmental and cost implications.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAttitude of Health Personnelen
dc.subject.otherBedding and Linensen
dc.subject.otherCatheters, Indwelling.adverse effects.standardsen
dc.subject.otherEquipment Failureen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherInfection Control.methods.standardsen
dc.subject.otherMedical Waste Disposalen
dc.subject.otherOccupational Exposure.adverse effectsen
dc.subject.otherQuestionnairesen
dc.subject.otherSafety Managementen
dc.subject.otherUrinary Catheterization.adverse effects.standardsen
dc.titleDraping and associated equipment for indwelling catheter manipulation by hospital staff: an assessment of attitudes and adequacy.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleBJU Internationalen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08248.xen
dc.description.pages1206-9en
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19154512en
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.