Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10483
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWan, Lien
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldoen
dc.contributor.authorMay, Clive Nen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-15T23:56:36Z
dc.date.available2015-05-15T23:56:36Z
dc.date.issued2007-12-01en
dc.identifier.citationAnaesthesia and Intensive Care; 35(6): 924-31en
dc.identifier.govdoc18084984en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10483en
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this study was to compare the effects on regional blood flow and regional oxygen delivery of 4% succinylated gelatin solution (Gelofusine, B. Braun) with those of normal saline. This was a randomised, controlled, cross-over large animal study, which took place at the animal laboratory of university physiology institute. The subjects were seven merino cross-ewes. We implanted flow probes around the aorta, coronary, renal and mesenteric arteries. We randomised animals to observation (control), normal saline (one litre over 15 minutes) or Gelofusine (one litre over 15 minutes). We measured central haemodynamics, organ blood flows, arterial blood gases and haemoglobin every 30 minutes for 210 minutes. Compared to control, both Gelofusine and normal saline significantly and similarly increased mean arterial pressure, stroke volume, cardiac output and central venous pressure in the first hour (P < 0.05). Such changes, however, were transient except for the increase in cardiac output seen with Gelofusine. Normal saline significantly increased mesenteric blood flow in the first hour (P < 0.05), while Gelofusine caused a specific, sustained and progressive increase in renal blood flow and conductance (P < 0.05). Both fluids increased urine output and creatinine clearance (P < 0.05), but, due to haemodilution, both decreased renal oxygen delivery in the first hour (P < 0.05). Normal saline and Gelofusine have transient, volume expansion-related systemic haemodynamic effects, which are greater for Gelofusine. Saline had a more pronounced early effect on mesenteric blood flow, while Gelofusine had a sustained and progressive greater effect on renal blood flow. The transient increase in urine output and creatinine clearance seen with both fluids occurred while renal oxygen delivery decreased.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAnimalsen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherGelatin.pharmacologyen
dc.subject.otherHemodynamics.drug effectsen
dc.subject.otherOxygen Consumption.drug effectsen
dc.subject.otherRegional Blood Flow.drug effectsen
dc.subject.otherSheepen
dc.subject.otherSodium Chloride.pharmacologyen
dc.subject.otherSuccinates.pharmacologyen
dc.titleA comparison of 4% succinylated gelatin solution versus normal saline in stable normovolaemic sheep: global haemodynamic, regional blood flow and oxygen delivery effects.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnaesthesia and Intensive Careen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.description.pages924-31en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18084984en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherBellomo, Rinaldo
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

6
checked on Mar 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.