Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDaniel, Jeffreyen
dc.contributor.authorChamberlain, Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorCastle, David Jonathanen
dc.identifier.citationAustralasian Psychiatry : Bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists; 15(5): 380-4en
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of atypical and typical anti-psychotics in treating behavioural disturbance in people with psychotic disorders, in a naturalistic setting.This was a prospective naturalistic study of 303 incidents of behavioural disturbance at Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.There was no significant difference between atypicals and typicals on two efficacy measures and some evidence on a third measure, that typicals are more effective.In the pharmacological treatment of behavioural disturbance in psychosis, typical and atypical anti-psychotics have largely comparable efficacy.en
dc.subject.otherAntipsychotic Agents.adverse effects.therapeutic useen
dc.subject.otherBenzodiazepines.adverse effects.therapeutic useen
dc.subject.otherInterviews as Topicen
dc.subject.otherMental Disorders.drug therapyen
dc.subject.otherPsychotic Disorders.classification.drug therapyen
dc.subject.otherReproducibility of Resultsen
dc.subject.otherTreatment Outcomeen
dc.titleThe pharmacological management of behavioural disturbance in psychosis: a naturalistic study.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAustralasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatristsen
dc.identifier.affiliationSecure Extended Care Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, Australiaen
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.