Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10155
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLangenberg, Christophen
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldoen
dc.contributor.authorMay, Clive Nen
dc.contributor.authorEgi, Moritokien
dc.contributor.authorWan, Lien
dc.contributor.authorMorgera, Stanislaoen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-15T23:31:00Z
dc.date.available2015-05-15T23:31:00Z
dc.date.issued2006-05-10en
dc.identifier.citationNephron. Physiology 2006; 104(1): p1-11en
dc.identifier.govdoc16691034en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttp://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/10155en
dc.description.abstractTo assess changes in renal vascular resistance (RVR) in human and experimental sepsis and to identify determinants of RVR.We performed a systematic interrogation of two electronic reference libraries using specific search terms. Subjects were animals and patients involved in experimental and human studies of sepsis and septic acute renal failure, in which the RVR was assessed. We obtained all human and experimental articles reporting RVR during sepsis. We assessed the role of various factors that might influence the RVR during sepsis using statistical methods.We found no human studies, in which the renal blood flow (and, therefore, the RVR) was measured with suitably accurate direct methods. Of the 137 animal studies identified, 52 reported a decreased RVR, 16 studies reported no change in RVR, and 69 studies reported an increased RVR. Consciousness of animals, duration of measurement, method of induction of sepsis, and fluid administration had no effect on the RVR. On the other hand, on univariate analysis, size of the animals (p < 0.001), technique of measurement (p = 0.017), recovery after surgery (p = 0.004), and cardiac output (p < 0.001) influenced the RVR. Multivariate analysis, however, showed that only cardiac output (p = 0.028) and size of the animals (p = 0.031) remained independent determinants of the RVR.Changes in RVR during sepsis in humans are unknown. In experimental sepsis, several factors not directly related to sepsis per se appear to influence the RVR. A high cardiac output and the use of large animals predict a decreased RVR, while a decreased cardiac output and the use of small animals predict an increased RVR.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAcute Kidney Injury.etiology.physiopathologyen
dc.subject.otherAnimalsen
dc.subject.otherBody Sizeen
dc.subject.otherCardiac Outputen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherKidney.blood supply.physiopathologyen
dc.subject.otherModels, Animalen
dc.subject.otherRenal Circulationen
dc.subject.otherSepsis.complications.physiopathologyen
dc.subject.otherVascular Resistanceen
dc.subject.otherVasoconstrictionen
dc.titleRenal vascular resistance in sepsis.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleNephron. Physiologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartments of Intensive Care and Medicine, Austin Hospital and University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000093275en
dc.description.pagesp1-11en
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16691034en
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.